Male. Photo by S. W. Bullington
| This subspecies is one of three described "varieties" under the name L. posticata, the other two being L. posticata brunnea (Bromley) and L. posticata scutellaris (Bromley). These latter were described as Bombomima in 1929. In keeping with the modern (and perhaps unfortunate) tendency to ignore varietal distinctions, Bromley's two names were listed as synonyms of L. posticata in the 1965 Diptera Catalog. I have seen specimens of L. posticata scutellaris, and they are very distinct from the nominate subspecies--so much so, in fact, that I would not hesitate to upgrade them to full specific status. I have therefore added a separate synopsis for this subspecies below. As for L. posticata brunnea, for now I will reserve judgement, but from the description it sounds more like a melanic form than something truly distinct. And as if this situation weren't complicated enough already, Bromley speculated in this 1934 Ph.D. dissertation that the species probably hybridized with the more southern L. virginica. I believe he was correct. I personally have seen a male L. posticata posticata pinned over a female L. virginica, presumably indicating that they captured while in copula. Whether the progeny from such a union could ever develop, or, if it did, what sort of adult would be formed, is unclear. The nominate subspecies is found in the United States from New England west to Minnesota, and across northern Canada perhaps to Alaska (see the notes in the section on Western Laphria.) It has the pile on abdominal tergites 4-5 all yellow, and on 6-7 all black. It is found in early summer, and ranges from 12-18 mm in body length. Adults have been reared from larvae collected in white pine stumps. The redescription below refers only to this subspecies. |
|
Still shot to come. Photo of live specimen. | This subspecies can be distinguished from L. posticata posticata most easily by looking at the color of the hairs on the margin of the scutellum, on the dorsal surface of the hind tibiae, and on tergite 6 of the abdomen. These hairs are all black in the nominate subspecies and yellow or golden-yellow in this one. The first and third of these may seem like trivial differences, until one considers that 1) the color of the scutellar hairs has been widely used in conjunction with other characters to differentiate species, and 2) the color of the tergal hairs alone separates the nominate subspecies from all of its conspecifics in the West. Further, not one of the three character states in L. posticata scutellaris is intermediate between L. posticata posticata and the one species with which it is suspected to occasionally interbreed, namely, L. virginica. The latter has black scutellar hairs, black tibial hairs, and an all-black abdomen. I have only seen two specimens of L. posticata scutellaris, one from the original paratype series from Ontario, and one from Michigan. This latter specimen differs slightly in the abdominal coloration. |
![]() Male. Photo by S. W. Bullington | This species is probably the commonest of all northeastern Laphria. It is an excellent mimic of the bumble bees Bombus impatiens Harris and B. vagans Smith, and when in flight cannot be distinguished from its models even at close range. It often haunts apiaries, and is the "bumble bee" bee keepers see making off with their bees. The color of the abdomen varies greatly, ranging from completely black to mostly yellow. It is likely that at least some of these variants represent undescribed species. However, despite the huge number of specimens in most collections, no one has ever taken the time to compare the geographic distribution of the various forms, to look for correlated, consistent differences in the terminalia of the males, or even to do the obvious studies of controlled mating and rearing. Adults have been reared from larvae collected from galleries in a chestnut tree, from a hollow apple tree, and from the stump of a tulip tree. The latter were described by Greene (1918). |